English Only Update EXTRA
HOUSE PASSES
OFFICIAL ENGLISH BILL
By Cassandra Burrell
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) – Almost all federal government business
would have to be conducted in English under a GOP
bill the House passed 259-169 Thursday after emotional debate. It would
mean an end to such services as Spanish-language tax instructions.
During a rare appearance as a debate participant, House
Speaker Newt Gingrich said English is the tie that binds the country together,
and mastery of the language is critical for immigrants who expect to do
well.
"Our greatness in part comes from our ability to
be a melting pot," Gingrich said. "While I cherish every person
who comes from anywhere who comes here legally and seeks to pursue happiness.
... I want them to become American, and part of becoming American involves
English."
Democrats denounced the bill as divisive, anti-immigrant
and disrespectful of minorities.
Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., drew Democratic applause after
suggesting that the bill be amended to bar presidential candidates from
using the federal campaign funds to advertise in Spanish. His idea was
voted down 257-171.
The Clinton administration threatened a veto. "This
highly objectionable bill is unnecessary, inefficient and divisive,"
said a statement released by the White House Office of Management and Budget.
Under the bill, the federal government would have to print
most of its documents in English. No longer would the Internal Revenue
Service print tax information in Spanish, for example.
Citizenship ceremonies would have to be conducted in English,
but government employees and officials would not be barred from speaking
with a person in foreign language.
The bill makes exceptions for agencies involved in international
relations, trade, the census and national security. Agencies also would
be allowed to communicate in other languages during emergencies that threaten
the public health or safety.
The bill also would kill part of the Voting Rights Act,
which requires that ballots be printed in foreign languages in areas with
large numbers of people whose native language is other than English. It
would not prohibit state or local officials from using foreign languages.
Citizens injured by an agency's failure to follow the
law would have the right to file civil lawsuits.
Supporters said the bill was needed because the federal
government shouldn't have to print documents in all of around 320 languages
residents speak.
Some also expressed fear that language difficulties reported
in bilingual nations such as Canada would erode U.S. unity.
Gingrich noted that public schools routinely provide instruction
in dozens of languages in parts of the United States that are home to pockets
of immigrants of a specific nationality.
"This is a level of confusion, which, if it was allowed
to develop for another 20 or 30 years, would literally lead, I think, to
the decay of the core parts of our civilization," Gingrich said.
Democrats spoke passionately against the bill. They said
it would keep hard-working, tax-paying, patriotic Americans from getting
information they need from the federal government only because they're
unable to speak English fluently. Democrat speakers also called the bill
a slap in the face for thousands of immigrants who can't enrol in overcrowded
English-language classes.
"My colleagues characterize this bill as common-sense
legislation," said Rep. William Clay, D-Mo. "It is neither common
sense nor common decency to mandate exclusive use of English while utterly
failing to address the practical need for English-language preparation."
"This is mean-spirited. I don't care how you camouflage
it," said Rep. E. "Kika" de la Garza, D-Texas. "This
bill is making us the laughing stock of the world. ... It's ridiculous.
It's absurd."
"And since we're legislating an official language,
how about an official religion to go along with it?" Rep. Thomas Foglietta,
D-Pa., said sarcastically.
"Come to think of it, why don't we just get rid of
the First Amendment altogether?"
The bill is H.R. 123.
Copyright 1996. The Associated Press.
All Rights Reserved. The information contained in the AP news report may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without
the prior written authority of The Associated Press.


|